Prosperous Period for US Billionaires: Why the Economic Structure Perpetuates Wealth Inequality
To numerous US citizens, the economy over the past five years has been difficult. Expenses have skyrocketed while salaries remains flat. Elevated mortgage rates have made homeownership a grim prospect. The jobless rate has been creeping up.
The majority of individuals have reported they're delaying major life decisions, including starting a family or switching jobs, because of economic uncertainty. But for a very small group of people, the past five-year period couldn't have been more prosperous.
Fortune Expansion
The wealth of the world's billionaires expanded 54% in 2020, at the climax of the pandemic. And even throughout all the financial uncertainty, the stock market has only persisted in expanding. This expansion has largely benefited just a limited group of Americans: 10% of the population holds 93% of stock market wealth.
However unequal as this distribution seems, it's the system working as it is currently designed.
"Rich elites have acquired their jets, they've purchased their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're buying senators and media outlets," explained economic inequality analyst Chuck Collins. "We're now stepping into this other chapter of extreme wealth extraction where the wealthy are exploiting the system of inequality."
Understanding Wealth Tiers
To help others comprehend what exactly it means to be "wealthy" in the US, Collins adopts a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, envisioned the different levels of wealth as "Affluencia" villages: Affluent Town, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.
To update the concept, Collins categorizes these "economic communities" based on income levels:
- At the base level, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a family earnings of at least $110,000 and an net worth of over $1.5m.
- The villages get more restricted as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
- Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
- Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.
Altogether, the residents of these villages constitute the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their circumstances vary dramatically.
"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still flying in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins said. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're traveling via a private jet. That's a really different cultural experience. You fly private, you have no investment in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system collapses – you're set."
Extreme Affluence Consequences
The highest hill in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's richest. The influence that this group has substantially outweighs those who are simply affluent, let alone the average American who doesn't live in "Richistan" at all.
But Collins thinks the activist mantra "end extreme wealth" doesn't capture the real problem and has a "whiff of exterminism" to it.
"It's the difference between individual behaviors and a framework of policies," Collins said. "We should be worried about an economic system that directs so much wealth upward to the billionaires."
Fortune Building Strategies
To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins separates it into four parts: getting the wealth, securing fortune, policy control and maximum resource extraction.
When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think only about the first step, Collins said. People can create a reasonable quantity of wealth through creating or operating a successful business, which could get them membership in Affluent Town.
But getting to Billionaireville requires serious investment and planning in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "asset protection sector": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their expertise to ensure that the super rich are being deliberate about their taxes.
"Wealth defense professionals use a extensive selection of tools such as financial instruments, international accounts, undisclosed businesses, charitable foundations and other vehicles to hold assets," he writes.
Political Influence and Hyper-Extraction
To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs government backing. Wealth of over $40m translates to political power, Collins says, and can be used to protect assets and ensure continued growth.
The last stage is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "hyper extraction" to describe how the wealthy have come to touch nearly every single part of an Americans' everyday life largely through investment firms, which allows wealthy individuals to support private companies.
"Private equity is seeking those areas of the economy where they can extract value a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people comprehend is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is accumulated in so few hands, and they can essentially pivot and say, 'Where else can we generate returns out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can boost their expenses."
The Real Consequences
The consequences of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people facing higher costs for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any substantial income improvement. And Collins said the suffering and anger of this kind of society can lead to deep discontent.
"The most powerful oligarchs understand people are being excluded [and] are monetarily hurting," Collins said, adding that Republicans have been good at tapping into a potent "fake grassroots movement".
Policy Situation
The paradox, Collins points out in his book, is that elected representatives have appointed a succession of billionaires to cabinet positions. Along with wealthy entrepreneurs who had short yet influential roles overseeing substantial reductions to the federal workforce, other key positions for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.
This political landscape, along with help from legislative supporters, helped pass huge tax bills, which will make permanent tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations.
Future Solutions
While government groups continue to argue that immigration and bad trade agreements are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the challenge is: Will the other major party, which has also been captured by the billionaires and big money, be able to effectively tackle the underlying harms?" Collins said.
Liberal leaders, he argues, know what policies are needed to "change wealth distribution", including substantial modifications to the tax system, boosting the minimum wage and supporting labor organizations.
"It was so, so close, and the law really did reflect the will of the most of people who really want lawmakers to solve some of these pressing issues," Collins said. "Oligarchic power is not about building so much as stopping. It's easier to block than it is to make something meaningful happen, but the historical precedent is there. We know what that looks like."
Collins is positive that there can be change, but said it would require sustained political momentum.
"It may be quickly that the pendulum swings back, and then it really is about maintaining a sustained really popular movement to make progress on this severe disparity we're living in," he said. "We can fix this. It is fixable."