🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear Ruben Amorim could survive a loss to Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. You come at the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight right-back in Blackburn’s championship 1994-95 season, the coach came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga appears to portray Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his nine months of experience with the Saints, to view him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

A Strategic Conflict Over Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in attempting to convince him to abandon his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team decades past.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – men like him – simply operate at a level exceeding our prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not quite equivalent to being prepared to receive.

The Supreme Power In Command

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his superior the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his preference for a four-man defense. According to reports, the owner has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for the club to embrace data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Ratcliffe is a specialist in these intricate footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Above all he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that appears a lot like an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Football Order: Executives Above Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, scouts – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to join a club and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have these guys set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. It is wiser to decide the tactics in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, but still ultimately answerable if it arrives cold or leaks out of the box.

Nowadays, a coach's role has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the visible figurehead of an organisation they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and effectively is dismissed for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged while those individuals who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this is simply corporate governance at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later discard him for requiring too long. And above all be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.